Banner

Back
Home
Next

Executive Summary

Overview
An Electronic Portfolio (ePortfolio) is a highly personalized, customizable, web-based information management system, which allows students to demonstrate individual and collaborative growth, achievement, and learning over time. An ePortfolio can be used in support of career planning and resume building, advising and academic planning, academic evaluation and assessment, and as a tool for reflection.

ePortfolios are of value to students for a number of reasons, but essentially, they place students at the center of their learning experience. ePortfolios allow students to manage and control access to their records, academic information and coursework, creating a sense of their academic experiences as a learning trajectory, by mapping out professional goals, experiences and outcomes.

Universities across the nation are creating and implementing ePortfolios as a vehicle for institution-wide reflection and learning, for assessment of student, faculty and staff populations, and for accreditation processes. ePortfolios are a growing trend among academic institutions across the country and abroad.

Objective
The UC Berkeley Leadership Development Program (LDP) ePortfolio Project Team was asked to research and make a recommendation as to whether a student ePortfolio should be implemented on the UC Berkeley campus. Our charge included presenting data in support of our recommendation, identifying content, partners, software and Open Source solutions, user interface options, student wishes, and best practices for planning and implementation.

This report is intended to provide a current "snapshot" of electronic portfolios, which is an evolving technology. Given the four-month time constraint, and broad scope of the project, this report is intended to be a guide for future consideration for the UC Berkeley campus.

Approach
Our findings were generated by web-based research, attending educational conferences, participating in ePortfolio discussion groups, interviews with experts at other universities, interviews with campus constituents, and by surveying students, faculty, and staff at UC Berkeley.

Findings

  • ePortfolios are a growing trend in higher education.
  • ePortfolios help students track requirements toward a degree.
  • Survey results show that students want more in person and on-line advising opportunities.
  • Students want a way to help identify skills necessary for their development and to receive guidance to show them how to develop skills at the University and elsewhere.
  • A student portal is not required to implement an ePortfolio system.
  • Implementing an ePortfolio requires a significant investment of resources.
  • ePortfolios will have an impact on faculty and staff workload and will cause a cultural shift.

    Conclusions

  • ePortfolios would support the strategic goals and mission of UC Berkeley.
  • An ePortfolio would communicate across disparate campus systems.
  • An ePortfolio promotes "student-centered learning" and encompasses five common features: storage, information management, connections, communication, and development.
  • A "new element" called a skills matrix feature should also be included to enhance the undergraduate experience at UC Berkeley.
  • ePortfolio features would connect students with support resources that are currently available, but underutilized.
  • A common theme of ePortfolios is their potential to turn information into knowledge through two important practices: reflection and social construction.
  • ePortfolios could incorporate customized, Open Source solutions.
  • Implementing an ePortfolio will raise a number of policy and security issues.
  • Representatives from key constituents (including Undergraduate Education and Student Affairs) could join forces to establish an ePortfolio implementation team.

    Recommendations
    The LDP ePortfolio Project Team recommends that UC Berkeley implement ePortfolios for students. Since Undergraduate Education and Student Affairs share a common mission and goal (to find ways that technology can enhance and support the undergraduate educational experience) we recommend that they create an implementation team. We further recommend that these divisions, along with other key constituents including representatives from Information Systems and Technology (IST), should join forces to investigate opportunities and possibilities, define academic, advising, and technology standards and strategize planning and implementation procedures.

    Educational Technology Services at UC Berkeley is currently developing a campus-wide Learning Management System (LMS) based on Open Source systems (to replace Blackboard and WebCT course management systems). We recommend that ePortfolios be introduced in conjunction with the new LMS to provide a tool for students to be at the center of their learning, to manage their own information, to connect and communicate with the larger Berkeley community, to develop skills, and to visualize a trajectory of their learning experience. This ePortfolio should be customized to meet UC Berkeley academic, technical, and policy standards.

    ePortfolio features help students manage the development of their skills and allow them to visualize their learning experiences. Some ePortfolio features already exist on the UC Berkeley campus. Until a robust ePortfolio system can be implemented, the campus should promote WebDisk and WebCrossing, two technology tools, which provide aspects of the connections, communication and storage features of an ePortfolio. The information management and development (reflection/skills matrix) features are a key to the success of the ePortfolio and should also be developed. An ePortfolio tutorial component should also be developed and made available to all users.

    In addition, it is recommended that the campus take advantage of a call to participate in the National Research Coalition for ePortfolio Learning. The main goals of the coalition are to provide national leadership in assessing the impact of ePortfolios and to convene researchers/practitioners to disseminate new information on a local and national level. This coalition will advance the body of knowledge about impacts of ePortfolio use, and our participation could place UC Berkeley at the forefront of ePortfolio development.

    Furthermore, the LDP project team recommends that UC Berkeley establish a centralized data warehouse to bring together disparate student systems and to facilitate the management of future ePortfolios. However, this is not a necessary first step toward the implementation of a student ePortfolio system.

    We have uncovered that ePortfolios are an exciting, constantly evolving concept that requires high-level campus support and a shared vision in order to be successfully implemented. ePortfolios could be the catalyst for a cultural shift for the way students learn on the UC Berkeley campus and how the University manages and shares information among students, faculty, and staff.

  • I. Introduction

    i. Definition & Value of Student Electronic Portfolios (ePortfolio)

    For the purpose of this study, we define an electronic portfolio (ePortfolio) as:

    A highly personalized, customizable, web-based information management system, which allows students to demonstrate individual and collaborative growth, achievement, and learning over time. An ePortfolio can be used in support of career planning and resume building, advising and academic planning, academic evaluation and assessment, and as a tool for reflection.

    ePortfolios are a growing trend among academic institutions across the country and abroad. Universities across the nation are creating and implementing ePortfolios as a vehicle for institution-wide reflection and learning, for assessment of student, faculty, and staff populations, and for accreditation processes.

    ePortfolios are of value to students for a number of reasons, but essentially because they place students at the center of their learning experience, allowing them to manage and control their own records and information, in order to make sense of and map out their academic and professional goals, experiences, and outcomes.

    ii. Objective

    The ePortfolio Project Team was asked to research and make a recommendation as to whether a student ePortfolio should be implemented on the UC Berkeley campus. Our charge included presenting data in support of our recommendation, identifying content, partners, software and Open Source solutions, user interface options, student wishes, and best practices for planning and implementation.

    This report is intended to provide a current "snapshot" of electronic portfolios, which is an evolving technology. Given the four month time constraint, and broad scope of the project, this report is intended to be a guide for future consideration for the UC Berkeley campus.

    "We seem to be beginning a new wave of technology development in higher education. Freeing student work from paper and making it organized, searchable, and transportable opens enormous possibilities for re-thinking whole curricula: the evaluation of faculty, assessment of programs, certification of student work, how accreditation works. In short, ePortfolios might be the biggest thing in technology innovation on campus. Electronic portfolios have a greater potential to alter higher education at its very core than any other technology application we've known thus far."
    (Source: Trent Batson, The Electronic Portfolio Boom: What's It All About?)

    iii. Approach

    Our findings were generated by discussion groups, one-on-one interviews with key campus officials and administrative staff, and the creation and distribution of a student survey and faculty/staff survey. We conducted an examination of existing tools, campus policies, and technology systems currently available on the UC Berkeley campus. We also conducted extensive on-line and telephone research to determine current ePortfolios adoption in the UC System and universities across the nation.

    1. Research
    • Conducted via the web, by phone and at educational conferences
    2. Interviews
    • Key campus officials, administrative staff, students, ePortfolio experts
      and staff at other universities. (See Appendix II-A. for a list of people
      interviewed.
    3. Surveys
    • The student, faculty/staff surveys were developed, distributed and compiled by the Office of Student Research. Complete survey information can be found in Appendices III-VI.
       
    A.Student Survey
    • Emailed to 2,000 students
    • Well-representative sample across majors, colleges, grades, ethnicities
    • 436 responses (22% return rate in 5 days)
    B.Faculty/Staff Survey
    • Emailed to approximately 800 faculty & staff members
    • 345 responses (43% return rate in 7 days)
    C.

    Spring 2003 Undergraduate Experience Survey (UCUES) Results

    4. Conferences
    • EDUCAUSE 2003 Conference: Team member Tony Christopher, UCB Technology Outreach Manager, conducted ePortfolio research at this conference.
    • Panel Discussion "Are Electronic Portfolios The Answer?" presented by Tony Christopher, The California Association for Institutional Research, Annual Conference, November 2003

     

    Back
    Home
    Next

    Return to top of page